The role of pastors is clear in Scripture: “Equip
the saints for the work of the ministry.” (Ephesians 4:12) But unfortunately, some pastors
confuse equipping for enablement.
Primarily, this is caused by fear on the part of
the pastor. Proverbs 29:25 warns us that “the fear of man is a snare." But
often, that fear doesn’t look like fear. Sometimes it looks quite courageous.
Sometimes it appears as though the pastor is working himself to death in
service to the church, when in reality he is doing all the work because he
fears a lack of control. Sometimes it appears the Word is proclaimed in an
uncompromising way, when in reality the pastor is just trashing people not in
the room to make those who are in the room feel as though they have no sin from which to repent. What follows are some ways I’ve
seen pastors enable dysfunction in their churches.
1. Throwing Red Meat to a Crowd Rather than Feeding
God's Word to the Flock. Let's face it. Most of us who
preach know where our "Amen corners are, and we know what to say to make
them noisy.
Homeschool Nazis love it when you attack the public
school system. Prophecy addicts long for you to spend every Sunday expounding
on some cryptic passage from Revelation. Hyper-Calvinists can’t get enough
discussion about “historic Baptist thought.” Conversely, those who think
Calvinism is the doctrine of antichrist shout loudly in response to a pastor
who dismisses the whole discussion with a single, broad-brushed reference to
John 3:16.
The issue here is that our people all have their
pet subjects, and if we want to stay on their “good side,” all we really need
to do is discover what those passions are and focus on them when we are in the
pulpit. Problem is, this approach never produces genuine disciples, because
when you give inordinate focus to a few subjects, you fail in your duty to
teach “the whole counsel of God.” (Acts 20:27)
Another issue that arises from using the pulpit to
simply throw out “red meat” for the crowd is that, strangely enough, you never
seem to get around to actually preaching to the people who are in the room.
It’s always what’s going on “out there,” or “those people” who are the cause of
the problem. In the process, our people are reinforced in their own pride and
never move significantly forward in the process of becoming more like Jesus.
To be sure, I’m not suggesting that you should
never speak of how your people should educate their children, or how Biblical
prophecy should affect our Christian walk. I’m simply suggesting that it takes
absolutely no courage to stand in a room full of conservative, heterosexual,
“red state” attendees and blame the homosexual community for all that is wrong
with our culture. It takes very little temerity to appeal to surface-level
exegesis in the attempt to get your people all bent out of shape over those
evil Calvinists.
And to stand in the pulpit, week after week, and do nothing
but condemn the people “out there” is more like the practice of a Pharisee, and
less like a New Testament pastor who follows Jesus by getting to the heart of
the real issues. Judgment, the Apostle Peter says, begins at the house of God
(1 Peter 4:17). If you genuinely preach the whole counsel of God, what you feed
your people won’t always taste good to them.
2. Hiding
from Hard Subjects. If I’ve heard it once, I’ve heard it 100
times from a pastor. “We don’t address THAT, because THAT would get us off
mission.”
On the
surface, I understand the sentiment. Our preaching and teaching can easily
become unbalanced if we focus too much on what we might think are “secondary
issues.” Still, too many pastors simply avoid hard subjects altogether.
What this teaches our people is that when the pressure is on, its OK to take
the easy way out.
But Struggle
is part of the Christian experience. When a baby dies, when a spouse is
diagnosed with a terminal disease, or when some other unspeakable tragedy
occurs, people need to be already armed with a solid understanding of
providence and sovereignty. They need to have already wrestled with the
tension between divine providence and human freedom in a way that brings them
toward greater intimacy with God BEFORE these things happen in their
lives. If that means the pastor has to occasionally “go deep” on a subject
like providence, so be it!
Likewise,
when a child struggling with homosexuality “comes out” or a businessman is
faced with the choice between keeping his integrity or keeping his job, the
truth of God’s Word from the pulpit should be in the minds of all who are
involved so that hard issues can be faced in a way that honors Jesus.
Too
often, pastors avoid these subjects, or worse, they oversimplify them in a way
that ignores the difficulties of applying one’s faith during hard
times. Enabling your people in this way is a treasonous act of denying
them the tools necessary to think and act for themselves in a way that brings
glory to God. Sure, there are more “practical matters” to attend to, and
those should be addressed as well.
Additionally,
every subject that is dealt with by a pastor should be connected to the larger
purpose of lifting up Jesus as the center and circumference of Scripture and
our faith. But if God’s Word addresses it, then we are bound by our
calling to address it as well.
3. Doing the
work rather than sharing the work. Maybe its motivated by
guilt. Or maybe its motivated by a desire to control every ministry. Whatever
the motivation, workaholism on the part of the pastor steals time from his
family, and steals opportunities for service from his people. Doing anything
(or worse, having your wife do anything) simply because ‘no one else will do
it’ enables the church in its current state of laziness and consumer-driven
sin.
Furthermore,
answering every phone call, making every visit and personally responding to
every need means you never equip the church to do these things and are
personally worn to the point where you eventually do nothing well. The late
Adrian Rodgers said it best: “The pastor who is always available is rarely
worth anything when he is available.”
4. Making
the church about you. This is, by far, the hardest statement in
this post, but its true. Pastor, the church is not about you! Its about the
body of Christ, and your validity in holding the pastoral office is tied
inextricably to how well you serve the people God has put under your charge.
When you
act, you should do so with their best interests in mind.
In too many evangelical traditions including my
own, the “celebrity culture” has produced many men who believe the church is
there so that they can advance themselves. Regrettably, I’ve encountered a few
pastors who make decisions that affect the entire church based solely on how
they will personally be affected. In the worst cases, this behavior
manifests itself in a pastor who uses the pulpit to get out all of his pent-up
frustrations, which is the pastor-congregation equivalent of spousal
abuse. Pastor, you serve the bride of Christ, and one day, you and I will
stand in front of Him and answer for how we have treated His wife while she was
in our care!
I’m convinced that codependency is a real issue
with many pastors and churches. Rather than empower and bless each other,
they use each other in a way that spreads dysfunction throughout the body, and
destroys any hope of that local church being faithful to her call. When a
pastor simply gives the people whatever they want whenever they want in an
attempt to keep his job, or be complimented, or to advance himself, such
behavior is not service. It is enablement. To be sure, pastors by
themselves cannot change this scenario. But men, we can, and we must,
resist the temptation to confuse equipping with enablement.
The fear of man is a snare. (Proverbs 29:25) Resist it, and serve
your people well as a result.
5 comments:
Calling Christians who choose to live out their convictions by a term like Nazis is not the way to love the Church.
And tossing most pastors into the same basket makes you appear to be doing what you scolded them for, that is painting with a broad brush.
I appreciate that you're trying to help but honestly your solutions come across as a little arrogant.
Good morning Kenny, and thanks for your comment.
I'm afraid you will have to further substantiate your claims, as you appear to have misunderstood what I wrote in an ancillary part of the post. I didn't call anyone names for simply living out their convictions, and the chief evidence of this is that I'm a Father of THREE home-schooled children. That doesn't make me a Nazi. If however, I was so focused on how my wife and I educate our children that I began to impose that approach on other parents, or started expecting my pastor to agree with me on this ancillary issue, and put an inordinate amount of attention on it in the pulpit, I think the metaphor "Nazi" might fit me pretty well. Its funny too.
As for the broad-brushing accusation, you have again misunderstood what was written. I don't believe the majority of pastors do this. I said "many" pastors to this. Though I don't have official stats to back up that claim, I do have much anecdotal evidence as I"m not a spring chicken on this issue and have more than 10 years of experience working closely with pastors. This isn't just happening in one or two churches. Its a prevalent issue that needs to be addressed.
You further make my point as to the broad brush. I too am a homeschooling father of six and a pastor, yet I have NEVER spoken of the issue from the pulpit as to how anyone else should choose to educate their children. The Bible is silent on the specifics of the issue, therefore so am I. While I found SOME of what you said about pastors to be true in my own ministry, most of it was untrue in my circumstance. Maybe having official stats would prove to be a beneficial practice in the future.Please don't get me wrong. I so appreciate the value of peer conviction, including yours, but only when it comes from fact and not opinion. Thanks for your response and patience as this is the first time I've ever answered a blog post.
Well I am glad to know that I was not brought brushing you. I would Joyce when any pastor doesn't fit the characteristics I wrote about. May God extend your ministry
To Kenny's point, Christians (especially pastors and authors) need to stop using terms like "Nazi" to describe people who are dogmatic about any particular belief. Nazi refers to a specific political party with nationalist socialist socio-economic designs, historically responsible for the torture and murder of many. "Nazi" as a term describing someone who is not a member of this particular mindset needs to be thrown to the wayside just like nonsense terms like "the wrong side of history."
Using that term so loosely makes us no different than people who use "bigot" as a euphemism for "Christian."
Post a Comment