Tomorrow marks one year since the unspeakable horror that took place at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown Connecticut. The post below originally appeared two days after those events.
Like most parents, I've taken stock the past two days of the time I spend with each of my children. And like most, I'm unsatisfied. In the wake of Friday's tragic shooting in Connecticut, many parents admit that they don't spend the time with their kids that they would prefer. Still, there are a few dates that have become traditions to block out on my calendar.
Friday morning was just such a date. Though it was my last day in the office for the year, I took an hour from that day to travel to my 7-year-old's elementary school for "Gingerbread House Day." I make it a point to be part of this event, and build and decorate a great (and tasty!) gingerbread house with my son. All of our kids have their own unique areas in which they excel, but when it comes to creativity, my Seth tops us all, and one of many evidences of this is the elaborate way in which he decorates a gingerbread house. We had a great time, along with other parents, teachers, and administration. The result was that by 10:30 AM the classroom was filled with gingerbread homes that made it look like a fantasy, winter wonderland.
After this event, I arrived back at the office shocked to find constant CNN news alerts and log-jammed social media, all reporting the unspeakable events that unfolded in Newtown, CT. It was some time later before I reconstructed the timeline in my head and realized that 20 first-graders were losing their lives in the same time-frame that my first-grader was building a gingerbread house with his dad. At that moment, the line between fantasy and reality was never drawn more clearly for me. Even now as I think about it, my heart breaks for those families.
As a parent, I experienced--and am still experiencing--all the emotions that go with bearing witness to an unspeakable massacre like this; sadness at the loss of life, shock at youth taken from us too soon, anger at the pure evil it took to commit such atrocity, and anxiety about protecting my own children from such an event. And of course, all of this happened in the middle of the "season of hope," but the more I've thought deeply about the events of this weekend, the more I realize that the "Christmas" most of our culture celebrates offers no hope at all.
On a subconscious level, many residents of Newtown know this too, as was evidenced by several families who are taking down their Christmas decorations in response to the shooting. In a sense, we should not only understand this way of processing grief, we should see a sense of appropriateness in it. For most of us, the Christmas we celebrate isn't real. Its a fantasy world in which we pretend to live each December. Whether its pretending we have money we don't that results in consumer debt, seeking joy and happiness in lights and festivities that wain over just a few weeks, or feigning belief in a mythical fat man who will bring us presents, this "Christmas" is a dream that does nothing to bring us hope, especially in tragedy.
When you have lost a child at this time of year, there is nothing hopeful about a beautifully wrapped gift that will never be opened. And in the wake of tragedy, the facade of tinsel, lights, and eight tiny reindeer fades quickly, and reveals our western, European-imported, American-materialized "holiday" for what it really is; a temporary month-long escape from the real world that provides zero hope.
If you want hope, you have to look to the real Christmas! Trouble is, the real Christmas doesn't cover up our sin with shiny gift wrap. It exposes it and crucifies it. My friend Russ Moore wrote a profound piece yesterday reminding us that the context of the first Christmas actually looked more like the scene in Newtown on Friday than the fantasy world we live in every December. King Herrod's murderous rage resulted in a blood-soaked Bethlehem, and while Jesus escaped death at this early moment in his life, the world into which He came was not safe. The hope of the real Christmas is that Jesus willfully entered human history to personally experience the very fallen world from which we try to escape, and to redeem us from the real cause of it all: ourselves!
Such is another reason we are so turned-off by the real Christmas. Rather than dress us up in red and green, it reveals our true nature, and our deepest need. During moments like this, its much easier to stare down gun manufacturers and mental health professionals than it is to look in the mirror. But blaming guns for this tragedy is as ridiculous as the tendency of some fundamentalist preachers to blame Budweiser for every drunk driving accident. Similarly, assuming every act of evil is a mental health problem is to deny the reality of demonic influence. It is understandable why so many in our modern world would reject the existence of these spiritual realities, but followers of Jesus have no excuse, and if you can witness events like those that transpired this weekend and still not believe in demon possession, something is seriously wrong with you. The problem is spiritual, and located precisely in the human heart; Adam Lanza's, yours, and mine.
Jesus' coming reminds us of how deeply we all stand in need of redemption. The fake Christmas fairy tale our culture has invented covers up that nature. But the Gospel presented in the real Christmas story reveals that each of us, apart from the grace of God, is capable of the very kind of atrocity that was committed this past Friday. Its easier to believe in hell when you see something like this. Its harder to fathom that you and I deserve it as well; that the same sin-sickness that motivated the perpetrator of this massacre resides in each of our hearts. Societal sin is easy to believe in. Corporate sin makes a good target for our rage. But the truth of the Gospel is that you, personally, suck just as badly, and that's a hard pill to swallow.
The real Christmas doesn't make things look prettier than they really are for a month. Instead, it redeems the ugly, the repulsive, and the sinful, and makes it truly beautiful for eternity. Jesus came into a world of violence, walked among the worst of our sin for 33 years, and then willfully gave His life, bearing the wrath of God in our place, and giving us the hope of being fully restored to the people God created us to be.
Christmas is the incarnation of the God-man, and is thus the inauguration of the eventual elimination of the very evil that brings us the kind of facade-destroying sorrow that has been experienced in Connecticut this weekend. Justice will be served, wrong will be righted, and people from every nation, tribe and tongue redeemed because of the real Christmas The best thing followers of Jesus can do is ditch the fairy tale, and embrace the reality of Jesus.
So let's have a conversation about the state of mental health in this country. Let's talk openly about how to keep firearms out of the hands of mentally unstable people. Those are not illegitimate subjects of discussion. But let's not pretend that treatment of the symptoms will cure the disease. And as followers of Jesus, let's refuse to play the worldly game of wrapping our sin up in shiny paper every December and pretending that it doesn't exist.
The deaths of these precious children, their teachers, and principal have destroyed "Christmas" as we know it--the "Christmas" most of us have invented and celebrate each year is gone, along with the false hope it provides. Now, its time to turn to the real thing and offer Him to the world.
In memory of those slain at Sandy Hook Elementary School:
Charlotte Bacon, age 6
Daniel Barden, age 7
Rachel Davino, age 29
Olivia Engel, age 6
Josephine Gay, age 7
Ana Marquez-Greene, age 6
Dylan Hockley, age 6
Dawn Hochsprung, age 47
Madeleine F. Hsu, age 6
Catherine V. Hubbard, age 6
Chase Kowalski, age 7
Jesse Lewis, age 6
James Mattioli, age 6
Grace McDonnell, age 7
Anne Marie Murphy, age 52
Emilie Parker, age 6
Jack Pinto, age 6
Noah Pozner, age 6
Caroline Previdi, age 6
Jessica Rekos, age 6
Avielle Richman, age 6
Lauren Rousseau, age 30
Mary Sherlach, age 56
Victoria Soto, age 27
Benjamin Wheeler, age 6
Allison Wyatt, age 6
Friday, December 13, 2013
Wednesday, December 11, 2013
Who's at War With Christmas?
Last week I was asked to be a guest on The Stream, a 30 minute news program on the Al Jazeera America Network. The show was taped, and will air on Christmas Eve, and then again on Christmas Day. When I asked the producer what the subject matter was for the show he replied "its about the War on Christmas."
Oh great.
I have past experience as a guest on this show, and know the people involved with putting it together to be great folks, so I said yes. As always, the hosts were fair, and the conversation was civil, which is quite an accomplishment for any journalist when you have a Baptist preacher and the leader of an Atheist Group on the same program! During the pre-interview on the phone the day before, the producer asked me a very straightforward question, "Joel, do you believe there is such a thing as a "War on Christmas?"
For some time, I haven't believed this was a question that could be answered with a simple yes or no. In one sense yes, there are a few people out there who would like to see Christmas eradicated from the public square--or at least those parts of it that appear to be affiliated with local, state, or federal government. Apparently, some confuse the establishment of a religion with the simple recognition by a public entity that people of faith exist, and that there are a lot of us! And, this confusion has somehow translated into animus for any public expression of faith, and the perception that nativity scenes on public property are a danger to America. Yeah, I think its silly too.
But for the past month I've listened to the conservative "talking heads" warn, as they do now on an annual basis, of the impending destruction of the Christmas season by the secular left. Organizations from the ACLJ to the American Family Association are adept at keeping us informed concerning the plethora of "liberal plots" to eradicate anything resembling Christ from the public square during the holiday season. AFA recently called for a boycott of Radio Shack by its ever-diminishing group of followers, apparently because Radio Shack doesn't mention Christmas in its holiday ads. Almost every year now, it seems yet another conservative is writing yet another book about the "War on Christmas."
But the simple reality is that not everyone celebrates Christmas. So when the cashier at Radio Shack wishes me "Happy Holidays!" I don't see that as an affront to my faith or offensive to Jesus. I simply see a young women who works for a company who would like to sell electronics to those who celebrate Christmas, and also to those who don't. Radio Shack exists to make money. It isn't their responsibility to talk about Jesus. That's my job. If you think the phrase "Happy Holidays" poses a threat to your faith, you have a very weak faith!
And when I think about that fact, I start wondering if the greatest threat to the central message of Christmas isn't the guy I see every morning in the mirror!
Every year we hear stories of ACLU sympathizers trolling schoolhouse and courthouse properties in search of nativity scenes to challenge. But the greater threat may not be the elimination of the nativity on public property, but rather the minimization of its meaning on private property. I think of the past several Christmas seasons, and I am embarrassed when I compare the time spent giving and opening gifts with that spent celebrating the greatest of all gifts. I remember as a child having to take a "time out" as it were, from my new toys to sit for the perfunctory reading of the Christmas story. With a nervous twitch that would not be relieved until I was back at my new electric racetrack set, I tried to fake interest in this story that I had heard so many times. To me, it was a required religious drudgery; a payment of sorts in exchange for two weeks of no school and new toys.
As an adult, I must still admit to giving more attention at times to my children’s presents than to their focus on Jesus as the center and circumference, not only of the season, but of our lives.
Sure, some of the methods used by secularists are ridiculous and silly. Yet there is something more ridiculous, and more offensive, than removing any mention of Christ from Christmas by those who don’t follow Him, and that is the trivialization of the Christ of Christmas by those who do claim to follow Him. It is the equivocation of God the Son with eight tiny reindeer.
Though we are quick to defend the identity of this season as “Jesus’ birthday,” we often neglect to think that the incarnation was infinitely more that that. Perhaps this is why reflection on the Biblical Christmas story has lost some of its luster. Luke wasn’t just writing history. He was proclaiming that the One who created and foreordained history stepped into history on our behalf! God wrapped Himself in human flesh, and the wonder of that incarnation causes all the lights and decorations in the world combined to pale in comparison. Frankly, my boredom as a child, and passivity as an adult with the Christmas story is not the result of the story itself, but of my failure to truly appreciate how that moment in history affects all of humanity. It fulfilled every promise of God that was made up until that moment, and assures all who believe that this perfect and divine manifestation of the ideal humanity provides the righteousness required for the intimate connection with our Creator for which all of humanity longs.
But the ultimate rejection of the season’s truest meaning sometimes comes, ironically enough, at the times when we think we have the season all figured out and are enjoying it to the fullest. And there is a real chance that this coming Christmas could be like the last one. We will read the story of the culturally questionable birth of a Jewish baby in a stall to a 14-year-old virgin and her blue-collar fiance. We will remember how He invested His life among those the world did not think worthy of investment, and how He claimed to come for the poor, the sick, and the sinful. We will reflect on this, the most vivid picture of what it means to be “incarnational,” and then forget that Jesus calls us to follow His example while enjoying our “upper-middle class” Christmas. Paul reminded the church at Corinth of Jesus’ words that the most blessed person is the person who chooses giving over receiving. Evidently, I haven’t wanted that blessing very often.
No, Freedom from Religion Foundation and Radio Shack aren’t our biggest issues this season. When it comes to the “War on Christmas,” the real culprits are those of us who should know better! And if I’m right, then we won’t recover the meaning of this season by court decision. Neither will we recover it by our materialism. The average American family will require the duration of 2014 to pay off the consumer debt they will incur in November and December of this year! Christmas is supposed to be the celebration of the ultimate gift--salvation from God in the person of Jesus Christ. What sense does it make for those who follow Him to celebrate it by going into debt for lesser things?
Instead, we should take ourselves back to that seminal moment in salvific history, hear the cattle in the stalls and smell the sheep dung. Hear the screams of a woman experiencing violent birthpangs who knew nothing of a soft bed, much less an epidural. Watch as the God-man in the body of a pre-pubescent boy learns the skills of a carpenter from his earthly father. Smell the stink of rotting human flesh as He walks among the lepers. Sense the spiritual darkness that has overcome the demoniac among the tombs. Feel the stomach-wrenching sensation of spikes being driven into the wrists. Sense the weight of God’s judgement upon all of humanity as it falls upon He who became sin for us. And feel the earth-shattering concussion that was the bodily resurrection.
There is a reason that the secular left is at war with Christmas. It is because this world is at war with Christ. Scary thing is, Jesus leaves no room for “fence-riders,” which means that my past passivity is, in His eyes, enmity. My boredom is, in reality, scorn that has creeped back into my life along with other fleshly things; a part of that old life that Paul tells me was crucified with Christ 2000 years ago.
If there is a war on Christmas, I fear that many who claim to follow Christ are, by their indifference to the season, aiding and abetting the enemy. Moreover, I fear that in the past, I have been among that number. But this year, I resolve to be on the offensive! My family and I will spend less time opening gifts, and more time in front of the advent candles. Through Salvation Army, the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering for International Missions, Samaritan’s Purse, and our own holistic service, we will serve those to whom Jesus calls us. And though our kids will enjoy a visit from Santa, they will be taught to stand in infinitely greater awe of their God, who eliminates all war and oppression, and who brings a Gospel of peace, all through His entrance into our world.
Not everyone celebrates Christmas. I want them to, but culture-warring seems to me to be the least effective way of bringing people to the manger.
I'm not sure if there is an all-out "war on Christmas." But as best as I understand the Scriptures, if there is one, whoever is waging it is going to lose. So I'd better be sure I'm not an unwitting accomplice to diminishing this holiday.. May God grant us the grace this Christmas season to speak with our lips, and our lives, of the Word who became flesh and dwelt among us.
Oh great.
I have past experience as a guest on this show, and know the people involved with putting it together to be great folks, so I said yes. As always, the hosts were fair, and the conversation was civil, which is quite an accomplishment for any journalist when you have a Baptist preacher and the leader of an Atheist Group on the same program! During the pre-interview on the phone the day before, the producer asked me a very straightforward question, "Joel, do you believe there is such a thing as a "War on Christmas?"
For some time, I haven't believed this was a question that could be answered with a simple yes or no. In one sense yes, there are a few people out there who would like to see Christmas eradicated from the public square--or at least those parts of it that appear to be affiliated with local, state, or federal government. Apparently, some confuse the establishment of a religion with the simple recognition by a public entity that people of faith exist, and that there are a lot of us! And, this confusion has somehow translated into animus for any public expression of faith, and the perception that nativity scenes on public property are a danger to America. Yeah, I think its silly too.
But for the past month I've listened to the conservative "talking heads" warn, as they do now on an annual basis, of the impending destruction of the Christmas season by the secular left. Organizations from the ACLJ to the American Family Association are adept at keeping us informed concerning the plethora of "liberal plots" to eradicate anything resembling Christ from the public square during the holiday season. AFA recently called for a boycott of Radio Shack by its ever-diminishing group of followers, apparently because Radio Shack doesn't mention Christmas in its holiday ads. Almost every year now, it seems yet another conservative is writing yet another book about the "War on Christmas."
But the simple reality is that not everyone celebrates Christmas. So when the cashier at Radio Shack wishes me "Happy Holidays!" I don't see that as an affront to my faith or offensive to Jesus. I simply see a young women who works for a company who would like to sell electronics to those who celebrate Christmas, and also to those who don't. Radio Shack exists to make money. It isn't their responsibility to talk about Jesus. That's my job. If you think the phrase "Happy Holidays" poses a threat to your faith, you have a very weak faith!
And when I think about that fact, I start wondering if the greatest threat to the central message of Christmas isn't the guy I see every morning in the mirror!
Every year we hear stories of ACLU sympathizers trolling schoolhouse and courthouse properties in search of nativity scenes to challenge. But the greater threat may not be the elimination of the nativity on public property, but rather the minimization of its meaning on private property. I think of the past several Christmas seasons, and I am embarrassed when I compare the time spent giving and opening gifts with that spent celebrating the greatest of all gifts. I remember as a child having to take a "time out" as it were, from my new toys to sit for the perfunctory reading of the Christmas story. With a nervous twitch that would not be relieved until I was back at my new electric racetrack set, I tried to fake interest in this story that I had heard so many times. To me, it was a required religious drudgery; a payment of sorts in exchange for two weeks of no school and new toys.
As an adult, I must still admit to giving more attention at times to my children’s presents than to their focus on Jesus as the center and circumference, not only of the season, but of our lives.
Sure, some of the methods used by secularists are ridiculous and silly. Yet there is something more ridiculous, and more offensive, than removing any mention of Christ from Christmas by those who don’t follow Him, and that is the trivialization of the Christ of Christmas by those who do claim to follow Him. It is the equivocation of God the Son with eight tiny reindeer.
Though we are quick to defend the identity of this season as “Jesus’ birthday,” we often neglect to think that the incarnation was infinitely more that that. Perhaps this is why reflection on the Biblical Christmas story has lost some of its luster. Luke wasn’t just writing history. He was proclaiming that the One who created and foreordained history stepped into history on our behalf! God wrapped Himself in human flesh, and the wonder of that incarnation causes all the lights and decorations in the world combined to pale in comparison. Frankly, my boredom as a child, and passivity as an adult with the Christmas story is not the result of the story itself, but of my failure to truly appreciate how that moment in history affects all of humanity. It fulfilled every promise of God that was made up until that moment, and assures all who believe that this perfect and divine manifestation of the ideal humanity provides the righteousness required for the intimate connection with our Creator for which all of humanity longs.
But the ultimate rejection of the season’s truest meaning sometimes comes, ironically enough, at the times when we think we have the season all figured out and are enjoying it to the fullest. And there is a real chance that this coming Christmas could be like the last one. We will read the story of the culturally questionable birth of a Jewish baby in a stall to a 14-year-old virgin and her blue-collar fiance. We will remember how He invested His life among those the world did not think worthy of investment, and how He claimed to come for the poor, the sick, and the sinful. We will reflect on this, the most vivid picture of what it means to be “incarnational,” and then forget that Jesus calls us to follow His example while enjoying our “upper-middle class” Christmas. Paul reminded the church at Corinth of Jesus’ words that the most blessed person is the person who chooses giving over receiving. Evidently, I haven’t wanted that blessing very often.
No, Freedom from Religion Foundation and Radio Shack aren’t our biggest issues this season. When it comes to the “War on Christmas,” the real culprits are those of us who should know better! And if I’m right, then we won’t recover the meaning of this season by court decision. Neither will we recover it by our materialism. The average American family will require the duration of 2014 to pay off the consumer debt they will incur in November and December of this year! Christmas is supposed to be the celebration of the ultimate gift--salvation from God in the person of Jesus Christ. What sense does it make for those who follow Him to celebrate it by going into debt for lesser things?
Instead, we should take ourselves back to that seminal moment in salvific history, hear the cattle in the stalls and smell the sheep dung. Hear the screams of a woman experiencing violent birthpangs who knew nothing of a soft bed, much less an epidural. Watch as the God-man in the body of a pre-pubescent boy learns the skills of a carpenter from his earthly father. Smell the stink of rotting human flesh as He walks among the lepers. Sense the spiritual darkness that has overcome the demoniac among the tombs. Feel the stomach-wrenching sensation of spikes being driven into the wrists. Sense the weight of God’s judgement upon all of humanity as it falls upon He who became sin for us. And feel the earth-shattering concussion that was the bodily resurrection.
There is a reason that the secular left is at war with Christmas. It is because this world is at war with Christ. Scary thing is, Jesus leaves no room for “fence-riders,” which means that my past passivity is, in His eyes, enmity. My boredom is, in reality, scorn that has creeped back into my life along with other fleshly things; a part of that old life that Paul tells me was crucified with Christ 2000 years ago.
If there is a war on Christmas, I fear that many who claim to follow Christ are, by their indifference to the season, aiding and abetting the enemy. Moreover, I fear that in the past, I have been among that number. But this year, I resolve to be on the offensive! My family and I will spend less time opening gifts, and more time in front of the advent candles. Through Salvation Army, the Lottie Moon Christmas Offering for International Missions, Samaritan’s Purse, and our own holistic service, we will serve those to whom Jesus calls us. And though our kids will enjoy a visit from Santa, they will be taught to stand in infinitely greater awe of their God, who eliminates all war and oppression, and who brings a Gospel of peace, all through His entrance into our world.
Not everyone celebrates Christmas. I want them to, but culture-warring seems to me to be the least effective way of bringing people to the manger.
I'm not sure if there is an all-out "war on Christmas." But as best as I understand the Scriptures, if there is one, whoever is waging it is going to lose. So I'd better be sure I'm not an unwitting accomplice to diminishing this holiday.. May God grant us the grace this Christmas season to speak with our lips, and our lives, of the Word who became flesh and dwelt among us.
Monday, December 02, 2013
What on Earth are we Afraid Of?
My wife will tell you that I'm not always the sharpest knife in the drawer, especially when it comes to quickly picking up on things. But a trend is afoot in the American church that is so obvious, you'd have to be asleep to miss it.
And the trend is this: Followers of Jesus in the west are increasingly filled with fear.
This fear is manifest in several ways, but mostly, I see it coming out in a paranoid way through people--and sometimes entire ministries--dedicated to criticizing any attempt to engage culture. Sure, we can cross the line and compromise Biblical principles, but between the guy who occasionally goes too far and has to repent, and the guy who does nothing because he fears going to far, put that first guy on my team!
Our world is changing, and doing so more rapidly than at any other time in human history. For a church that was so sure of itself just decades ago because of the relatively prominent place we held in western society, these changes feel threatening, principally because they make us UNsure. But as frightening as it may be to think of engaging the world in new and fresh ways, there is something we should fear even more.
The more I observe the modern paralysis in the western church, the more I'm reminded of a well-known parable of Jesus. In Matthew 25, a landowner entrusts three of his servants with varying degrees of oversight--five talents to one, two to another, and one to the last. The first two went to work using the resources that had been given to them, and doubled their investment by their master's return, but the third buried his talent.
So when the master returns, he rewards the first two servants with more opportunity and responsibility, but took particular exception to the third, who told him "I know you. Your'e a difficult man, reaping where you haven't sown and gathering where you haven't scattered seed. So I was afraid, and went off and hid your talent in the ground." (25:24-25, HCSB)
The thing about Mason jars is that while they protect money and keep it from getting dirty, they don't earn anything either. And, this Master apparently didn't care if his money got a little dirty. He wanted a return on his investment!
Keep in mind that this is one of three stories linked together to teach us about the Kingdom. The point? Our Master expects us to engage, and He expects us to produce. And what is the one thing that kept the last servant from doing what his Master expected?
Three words: "I was afraid."
People driven by fear are actually pretty easy to spot:
1. They dismiss any expectations beyond "faithfulness." "We aren't responsible for the results. We are just supposed to be faithful." Sounds great doesn't it? Problem is, it just ain't true! Now, if by "results" you mean sheer numbers, then you may have a point. God doesn't call every pastor to lead a mega-church, we are all gifted in different ways, and sometimes the results of our labors will look very different. But a casual perusal of any parable about the Kingdom, or just reading the Sermon on the Mount, reveals quickly that Jesus expects results. Salt can't help but preserve. Light naturally illuminates. And when we are granted stewardship of the most powerful and effective story in history, you'd better believe Jesus expects us to do something with it that results in transformation. Dismissing those demands by surface level appeals to 1 Corinthians 3:6 or other similar texts is the mental equivalent of putting the gifts God has given you 6 feet under for safe keeping. There is no "increase" without planting and watering, but the latter ALWAYS leads to the former in some form.
2. They see "compromise" in every attempt to engage. In 1790, there was virtually no Christian presence that existed in the world that was further than 100 miles from the north Atlantic Ocean. It was in that environment that a young William Carey realized the need for alternative means to reach people with the message of Jesus, and in spite of his hyper-Calvinist detractors, his efforts launched the modern missions movement. Over the next century, the world would know of Jesus through rapid evangelism and church planting efforts that would eventually mean a Christian presence in most nations.
Nearly 300 years later, the modern era has come to an end, and we are witnessing a massive and rapid shift and collision of cultures like never before. Where is the next William Carey? My guess is he will emerge from one of the many being currently flayed by critics too afraid to join him in his efforts to engage the postmodern world. Historically unprecedented global migration patterns, which came as a result of now inexpensive global travel and rapid technological advance, has "reset" boundaries of every sort and kind in this new world. The modern world, which was marked by hard national, tribal, linguistic, religious and even ethic and racial lines is gone. Everyone now lives everywhere, and thus the way we interact with the world has to reflect this new reality. But those too anxious to hunch and feel their way through this new global arrangement tend to see compromise rather than effective engagement
3. They have little confidence in the efficacy of the Gospel. Paul put it this way: The Gospel is "the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes." I still believe this. The grand story of God's redemptive mission by sending Jesus into the world has no equal in the universe! No other vain, empty philosophy even comes close! So if its really true, and it its really that powerful, why is there such fear among Christ followers just because the world has changed?
The only conclusion I can reach is one of tragic irony: Too many followers of Jesus are actually afraid of the world He died to save!
Maybe its because we want the "old days" back when we sat in comfort atop the mountain of cultural superiority. Maybe we long for the days when all the non-Christians were "over there," and even those who were "over here" didn't have that much influence.
In this present world, when my neighbor is as likely to be a Hindu as a Presbyterian, its harder to be trite, simplistic, and distant from those who don't follow Jesus. "Sunday School" answers to their questions just won't cut it. I'm actually going to have to use my head, and in the process, build a relationship with someone with a radically different worldview.
Yep, I can understand why we would prefer the old world. But you and I live right here, right now, and Jesus has given us the world we have. One day, He is coming back. On that day, will you have your shovel in one hand, and a dirty Mason Jar in the other? Or, will you have found ways to invest the Gospel in this brave new world in a way that will cause Him to say "well done, good and faithful servant."?
Jesus is Lord over the whole earth, and every part of it, and His is the most wonderful, and powerful story in all of human history, and He has given it to you. What on earth are you afraid of?
And the trend is this: Followers of Jesus in the west are increasingly filled with fear.
This fear is manifest in several ways, but mostly, I see it coming out in a paranoid way through people--and sometimes entire ministries--dedicated to criticizing any attempt to engage culture. Sure, we can cross the line and compromise Biblical principles, but between the guy who occasionally goes too far and has to repent, and the guy who does nothing because he fears going to far, put that first guy on my team!
Our world is changing, and doing so more rapidly than at any other time in human history. For a church that was so sure of itself just decades ago because of the relatively prominent place we held in western society, these changes feel threatening, principally because they make us UNsure. But as frightening as it may be to think of engaging the world in new and fresh ways, there is something we should fear even more.
The more I observe the modern paralysis in the western church, the more I'm reminded of a well-known parable of Jesus. In Matthew 25, a landowner entrusts three of his servants with varying degrees of oversight--five talents to one, two to another, and one to the last. The first two went to work using the resources that had been given to them, and doubled their investment by their master's return, but the third buried his talent.
So when the master returns, he rewards the first two servants with more opportunity and responsibility, but took particular exception to the third, who told him "I know you. Your'e a difficult man, reaping where you haven't sown and gathering where you haven't scattered seed. So I was afraid, and went off and hid your talent in the ground." (25:24-25, HCSB)
The thing about Mason jars is that while they protect money and keep it from getting dirty, they don't earn anything either. And, this Master apparently didn't care if his money got a little dirty. He wanted a return on his investment!
Keep in mind that this is one of three stories linked together to teach us about the Kingdom. The point? Our Master expects us to engage, and He expects us to produce. And what is the one thing that kept the last servant from doing what his Master expected?
Three words: "I was afraid."
People driven by fear are actually pretty easy to spot:
1. They dismiss any expectations beyond "faithfulness." "We aren't responsible for the results. We are just supposed to be faithful." Sounds great doesn't it? Problem is, it just ain't true! Now, if by "results" you mean sheer numbers, then you may have a point. God doesn't call every pastor to lead a mega-church, we are all gifted in different ways, and sometimes the results of our labors will look very different. But a casual perusal of any parable about the Kingdom, or just reading the Sermon on the Mount, reveals quickly that Jesus expects results. Salt can't help but preserve. Light naturally illuminates. And when we are granted stewardship of the most powerful and effective story in history, you'd better believe Jesus expects us to do something with it that results in transformation. Dismissing those demands by surface level appeals to 1 Corinthians 3:6 or other similar texts is the mental equivalent of putting the gifts God has given you 6 feet under for safe keeping. There is no "increase" without planting and watering, but the latter ALWAYS leads to the former in some form.
2. They see "compromise" in every attempt to engage. In 1790, there was virtually no Christian presence that existed in the world that was further than 100 miles from the north Atlantic Ocean. It was in that environment that a young William Carey realized the need for alternative means to reach people with the message of Jesus, and in spite of his hyper-Calvinist detractors, his efforts launched the modern missions movement. Over the next century, the world would know of Jesus through rapid evangelism and church planting efforts that would eventually mean a Christian presence in most nations.
Nearly 300 years later, the modern era has come to an end, and we are witnessing a massive and rapid shift and collision of cultures like never before. Where is the next William Carey? My guess is he will emerge from one of the many being currently flayed by critics too afraid to join him in his efforts to engage the postmodern world. Historically unprecedented global migration patterns, which came as a result of now inexpensive global travel and rapid technological advance, has "reset" boundaries of every sort and kind in this new world. The modern world, which was marked by hard national, tribal, linguistic, religious and even ethic and racial lines is gone. Everyone now lives everywhere, and thus the way we interact with the world has to reflect this new reality. But those too anxious to hunch and feel their way through this new global arrangement tend to see compromise rather than effective engagement
3. They have little confidence in the efficacy of the Gospel. Paul put it this way: The Gospel is "the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes." I still believe this. The grand story of God's redemptive mission by sending Jesus into the world has no equal in the universe! No other vain, empty philosophy even comes close! So if its really true, and it its really that powerful, why is there such fear among Christ followers just because the world has changed?
The only conclusion I can reach is one of tragic irony: Too many followers of Jesus are actually afraid of the world He died to save!
Maybe its because we want the "old days" back when we sat in comfort atop the mountain of cultural superiority. Maybe we long for the days when all the non-Christians were "over there," and even those who were "over here" didn't have that much influence.
In this present world, when my neighbor is as likely to be a Hindu as a Presbyterian, its harder to be trite, simplistic, and distant from those who don't follow Jesus. "Sunday School" answers to their questions just won't cut it. I'm actually going to have to use my head, and in the process, build a relationship with someone with a radically different worldview.
Yep, I can understand why we would prefer the old world. But you and I live right here, right now, and Jesus has given us the world we have. One day, He is coming back. On that day, will you have your shovel in one hand, and a dirty Mason Jar in the other? Or, will you have found ways to invest the Gospel in this brave new world in a way that will cause Him to say "well done, good and faithful servant."?
Jesus is Lord over the whole earth, and every part of it, and His is the most wonderful, and powerful story in all of human history, and He has given it to you. What on earth are you afraid of?